|
|
World Summit on Sustainable Development
- Policy Brief #1 - Overview
Thursday, February 28, 2002
Dear Friend of the World Summit!
The Worldwatch Institute is pleased to send you the first in our series
of World Summit Policy Briefs. Written by our team of award winning researchers
the briefs will focus on the environmental and sustainable development
issues that are set to shape this year's World Summit on Sustainable Development
in Johannesburg, South Africa. Characterized by Worldwatch's uniquely
global, multidisciplinary outlook on major environmental and development
issues, each brief will build on recommendations and priorities outlined
in/ State of the World 2002/ and highlight topics and themes emerging
from the preparatory commissions of the World Summit. Upcoming briefs
will cover forests, tourism, mining, agriculture, oceans, toxics, population,
water and climate, wrapping up with a piece on global governance in late
August. We trust that this series will serve as a useful resource in preparation
for the Johannesburg event.
Sincerely
Susanne Martikke
Communications Associate
Growing Awareness, Sluggish
Response by Gary Gardner
WASHINGTON, DC February 28, 2000
This August, ten years after the Earth Summit in Rio, the United Nations
will again host a global meeting, the World Summit on Sustainable Development
in Johannesburg. The World Summit provides the world's leaders a historic
chance to strike a new deal for an economically, socially, and environmentally
sustainable world-a chance they cannot afford to miss. Awareness of the
threats to the Earth's ecosystems has grown since Rio, but in many cases,
our response to this increased awareness has been sluggish. We are still
far from ending the economic and environmental marginalization that afflicts
billions of people. The divide between rich and poor is widening in many
countries, undermining social and economic stability, while pressures
on the world's natural systems continue to mount.
This is the first in a series of Worldwatch issue briefs to be published
leading up to the World Summit. It describes key lessons learned over
the past decade about selected environmental and social challenges, the
goals set for addressing those challenges, and progress, if any, in achieving
those goals.
Climate Change
What the world learned: In 1996, the scientific panel set up by the United
Nations reported that a "discernible human influence" was evident
on a changing global climate. By 2001, the group was more definitive:
"most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely to
have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations."
What goals were set: At the Earth Summit, 170 nations agreed to voluntary
reductions of greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels. By mid-decade,
negotiations were underway for binding reductions in industrial nations,
to 6-8 percent below 1990 levels, leading to the Kyoto Protocol in 1997.
Meanwhile, the U.N. climate panel said that climate stabilization would
require emissions reductions of 60-80 percent.
What happened: Carbon emissions globally increased by 9 percent between
1992 and 2001. In the U.S., they increased by 18 percent. The United States
withdrawal from the Protocol in 2001, and President Bush's 2002 decision
to rely on voluntary, efficiency-driven measures to control emissions,
will likely result in further increases in US emissions by 2010
Species Loss
What the world learned: The World Conservation Union "Red List"
surveys reported at mid-decade that 13 percent of fish, 11 percent of
mammals, 10 percent of amphibians, 8 percent of reptiles and 4 percent
of birds, were in immediate danger of extinction. Species losses, estimated
at 100 to 1000 times the preindustrial rate, led biologists in the 1990s
to describe the contemporary era as a mass extinction, the first in 65
million years. Habitat disruption was cited as the leading cause of the
declines.
What goals were set: Over the decade, 182 countries became parties
to the Convention on Biological Diversity, one of the crowning achievements
of the Earth Summit. These countries promised to abide by broad guidelines
for biodiversity protection, and to develop national strategies for doing
so. National governments also made separate promises over the decade to
protect important habitat, especially forests.
What happened: The two richest sources of biodiversity-forests and coral
reefs-both suffered increased damage in the 1990s. Forested area, according
to the Food and Agriculture Organization, contracted by 2.2 percent in
the 1990s (a conservative estimate, in part because it includes habitat-poor
plantation forests). And the area of coral reefs regarded as seriously
degraded rose from 10 percent in 1992 to 27 percent in 2000. Meanwhile,
only 38 percent of parties to the Biodiversity Convention have submitted
national conservation strategies.
Water Scarcity
What the world learned: Policymakers and activists began to question the
heavy dependence on dams, irrigation canals, and other large water supply
projects. In their place, researchers developed the concept of integrated
water management, combining attention to securing supplies with increasing
water efficiency, meeting basic human needs for water, and giving water
its proper cultural, economic, and environmental value.
What goals were set: Agenda 21, the action plan that emerged from the
1992 Earth Summit, along with declarations emerging from the 1994 and
1998 UN Commission on Sustainable Development meetings, all called for
the adoption of integrated water management and for greater attention
to the water needs of the poor.
What happened: Advances in providing access to clean water and sanitation
were impressive in absolute terms, but barely kept pace with population
growth; more than 1.1 billion people still lack access to clean drinking
water. And water is still widely mismanaged: aquifers, for example, are
over pumped in major farming regions to the point that sustained production
of as much as 10 percent of the global grain supply is now at risk. A
growing number of major rivers, including the Yellow, Indus, Ganges, and
Colorado, now run dry at some point each year. And water planners widely
ignore environmental, cultural, and economic values in water planning,
leading to waste and degradation on a broad scale.
Malnutrition
What the world learned: Malnutrition involves more than a lack of calories:
deficiencies of vitamins and minerals can produce mental retardation,
blindness, and other developmental problems. And excessive consumption
of sugar and fat, a rapidly growing form of poor nutrition, leads to obesity
and increased risk of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other chronic
ailments. Meanwhile, nutritionists recognized that hunger, the most acute
form of malnutrition, is often caused by poverty, not simply by insufficient
food supplies.
What goals were set: At the World Food Summit in Rome in 1996, 185 countries
and the European Union pledged to cut in half the number of people who
are hungry by 2015.
What happened: By the Food and Agriculture Organization's own reckoning,
the number of hungry people in the world has decreased by 6 million per
year since the 1996 Food Summit, far short of the annual reduction of
22 million needed to meet the goal for 2015. Meanwhile, roughly half of
adults in many industrial countries are overweight, and many developing
countries saw sharp increases in the overweight population. Partly as
a result, diabetes cases rose fivefold globally, to 150 million, between
1985 and 2000.
Infectious Disease
What the world learned: Good health requires not only access to medical
care, but also a robust natural and social environment. An estimated 80
percent of all disease in developing countries, for example, is caused
by consumption of contaminated water. And air pollution is estimated to
cause 5 percent of the world's deaths each year.
What goals were set: Health goals spelled out in Agenda 21 include universal
access to safe drinking water and sanitation, 50 to 70 percent reductions
in deaths from diarrhea and 95 percent reductions in measles deaths by
1995.
What happened: Deaths from four of the world's six leading killer infectious
diseases, including diarrhea and measles, declined over the decade, although
by far less than targeted. These gains were more than offset by the sixfold
increase in deaths from AIDS. Water and sanitation became more widely
available, as noted, but more than 1.1 billion people still do not have
access to clean water, and 2.4 billion do not have access to adequate
sanitation.
Education
What the world learned: Over the decade, researchers showed that education
was a high-leverage investment area essential to a sustainable development
agenda. Children who go to school generally have improved health and nutritional
levels and lower poverty rates over their lifetime. And educated girls
are likely to have fewer children and more economic opportunities.
What goals were set: In 1990, 155 nations at the UNESCO-sponsored World
Conference on Education for All pledged to provide universal access to
primary education, a halving of the global adult illiteracy rate by 2000,
and a closing of the gender gap in literacy. A commitment to basic education
was endorsed at 10 other major international conferences in the 1990s,
including the Earth Summit.
What happened: The number of unenrolled children globally fell from 127
million in 1990 to 113 million in 1998, and the share of the world's adults
that could not read or write also declined, from 24.8 percent to 20.6
percent. Nevertheless, these achievements fall well short of the goals
set in 1990: one of every six adults still cannot read or write, and the
number of illiterate women increased over the decade.
Next Page - >
|